This hackathons is only open to students. Double check the event page for more information as this may mean only those from a particular university/country are eligible.
Event Type
in person
882
Participants
$8,500
Prize Pool
79
Est. Projects
Organizers
Alex Johnson
alex@example.org
Jamie Rivera
jamie@example.org
Sam Chen
sam@example.org
Quality Score
Quality Score
72/100
High confidence
Organiser16/20
Event Maturity14/20
Sponsors18/25
Participants12/20
Who Can Participate:
Undergraduate, postgraduate, and doctoral students
Students currently enrolled in accredited institutions
Recent graduates (within a reasonable academic transition window)
Computer Science & Engineering
Cybersecurity & Information Security
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
Data Science & Analytics
Public Policy, Law, Governance & International Relations
Design, Psychology, Sociology, and other disciplines related to human impact and trust
Team size:
Individuals or teams of up to 3 members
Cross-disciplinary teams are strongly encouraged
Problem Focus & Themes:
Trust & Safety in digital platforms
AI misuse, abuse, and governance gaps
Cybercrime, fraud, and online harm
Data protection, privacy, and surveillance risks
Security of critical digital infrastructure
Ethical and societal implications of emerging technologies
Hackathon Format:
Format overview:
Online hackathon
Problem statements released after registration
Research, design, and solution-building phase
Final submission and evaluation by an expert jury
Participants are expected to submit:
A clear articulation of the problem
Their proposed solution (technical, policy, or hybrid)
Rationale, assumptions, and trade-offs considered
Expected impact, limitations, and scalability
Guidelines & Expectations:
Solutions must be original work created during the hackathon period
Plagiarism or use of pre-built solutions without disclosure will result in disqualification
Participants should clearly state assumptions, limitations, and risks
Ethical considerations and human impact must be addressed
Teams should avoid overclaiming and focus on feasibility
Evaluation Criteria:
Problem understanding and relevance
Quality and originality of the solution
Consideration of security, ethics, and human impact
Feasibility under real-world constraints
Clarity of presentation and reasoning
Why Participate:
Work on problems that matter beyond the classroom
Engage with cyber and AI challenges at a global policy level
Gain visibility at the CyberPeace Summit
Learn to think across technology, governance, and society
Be part of a serious, impact-driven global initiative